Hi, I have two questions regarding custom recipes:
1)
For each comment I would like the annotator to label the following for three labelling schemes:
Where - A list of 8 locations
What - A list of things that can happen at those locations
Discipline - Team that should take care of the problem
for example:
"I was at the library and bullies stole my ipad"
Where: Library
What: Theft
Discipline: Security
"The roof in our dorm is leaking"
Where: Dormitories
What: Leak
Discipline: Maintenance
I would like I do something like this to optimize the time spent by each annotator on each text:
blocks = [
{"view_id": "choice", "field_id": "where_label", 'options':wheres},
{"view_id": "choice", "text": None, "field_id": "what_label", 'options':whats},
{"view_id": "choice", "text": None, "field_id": "discipline_label", 'options':disciplines},
]
This doesn't work exactly right, all the choice blocks are connected, not independent. (I don't think the field_id does anything here either)
Is there a way to do this with custom recipes, that is one label set per labelling scheme for each example?
I have been able to do this in some fashion with an option list that is the superset of all the labeling scheme options and allowing multiple selections by setting the choice_style. Wondering if there is a better way
2)
Is it possible to pass text to be annotated via the URL, a bit like the way session is passed? I have a Microsoft PowerBI report that can be used to efficiently identify underperforming classes, but no easy way to really integrate back to Prodigy since powerbi has very limited interactivity as far as ability to write back to databases or datasources. I am able to generate URLs that could send our annotators back to prodigy.
Finally, thankyou for such a great tool and excellent documentation!
Ivan