# textcat.batch-train question **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [November 4, 2022, 1:40pm UTC](https://support.prodi.gy/t/textcat-batch-train-question/6074 "2022-11-04T13:40:21Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 8
**Author:** ![ryanwesslen](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/support.prodi.gy/ryanwesslen/32/2969_2.png) [@ryanwesslen](https://support.prodi.gy/u/ryanwesslen)\ **Post date:** [November 28, 2022, 6:11pm UTC](https://support.prodi.gy/t/textcat-batch-train-question/6074/8 "2022-11-28T18:11:31Z")
Have you seen this post? > [@Does Prodigy supports hierarchical annotation?](https://support.prodi.gy/t/does-prodigy-supports-hierarchical-annotation/1249/2): > > Prodigy itself is pretty agnostic to what your annotations “mean” so you can definitely build a workflow like this. The only thing that’s kinda built-in is a strong focus on single decisions at a time and automating as much as possible. One approach could be to use the [choice interface](https://prodi.gy/demo?view_id=textchoice) and start by annotating the top-level buckets like A, B and C, without worrying about the lower-level categories. [See here](https://prodi.gy/docs/workflow-custom-recipes#example-choice) for an example recipe code. In the next step, you can then stream in the examples again a… It outlines how to approach this with a custom recipe. --- _[View the full topic](https://support.prodi.gy/t/textcat-batch-train-question/6074)._