# Insult classifier tutorial - Zero insults shown in classification step

**URL:** <https://support.prodi.gy/t/insult-classifier-tutorial-zero-insults-shown-in-classification-step/2541>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Tags:** usage, textcat\
**Created:** [February 12, 2020, 1:42pm UTC](https://support.prodi.gy/t/insult-classifier-tutorial-zero-insults-shown-in-classification-step/2541 "2020-02-12T13:42:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ines](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/support.prodi.gy/ines/32/3_2.png) [@ines](https://support.prodi.gy/u/ines)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2020, 4:05pm UTC](https://support.prodi.gy/t/insult-classifier-tutorial-zero-insults-shown-in-classification-step/2541/2 "2020-02-12T16:05:14Z")

</div>

> [@matthew](#):
>
> The first section of creating the extended list of insults worked well. However, within the second section whereby I classify whether a given sentence contains an insult, not a single sentence given contained anything even closely resembling an insult.

Hi! Could you share the command you're running and an excerpt from the patterns you created using the insults terminology dataset? One possible explanation is that the insults patterns aren't matched, so all you see are the models suggestions, which are completely random (since the model hasn't really learned anything about insults yet).

---

_[View the full topic](https://support.prodi.gy/t/insult-classifier-tutorial-zero-insults-shown-in-classification-step/2541)._